Ryan Garcia defended his WBC welterweight title against Conor Benn on Saturday night in Las Vegas, winning by second-round stoppage. Reports place the combined purse at around $30 million, roughly $15 million each. The bigger financial story isn’t the number, it’s who actually wrote the checks: not TKO, not the gate, but Saudi Arabia’s Sela, fronted by advisor Turki Alalshikh.
The numbers nobody can actually confirm
Nevada no longer requires public purse disclosure, so unlike a decade ago, there’s no official state record to check these figures against. What circulates before and after a fight like this is industry reporting and estimate, not filed paperwork. The Guardian’s reporting of a $30 million combined purse, split evenly, is the figure most other outlets have converged on, but “converged on” and “confirmed” are different things in a sport that has quietly removed the mechanism that used to make these numbers verifiable.
That’s a meaningful shift on its own. Boxing purses becoming bigger and less transparent at the same time is not a coincidence, it’s what happens when the money funding the sport increasingly comes from outside the traditional promoter and broadcaster structure.
Who’s actually paying
TKO president Mark Shapiro was direct about where the money came from, telling reporters in February that Conor Benn’s purse “is not TKO going out of pocket,” and that Sela, led by Turki Alalshikh, was covering it. That’s the real headline buried under the fight result: a Saudi-backed entity financed one of the year’s biggest boxing purses, not the promotion generating the money organically through ticket sales and pay-per-view.
This isn’t unique to Garcia-Benn. This site has already covered how outside capital reshapes the economics of combat sports, from UFC’s Paramount broadcast deal restructuring where fighter pay actually comes from, to how private capital has moved into club and league ownership more broadly. Boxing’s version of the same trend is Gulf state financing effectively underwriting marquee fight purses, which means the sport’s biggest paydays increasingly depend on a funding source with no obligation to keep showing up.
What each fighter’s number actually means
Garcia’s $15 million looks smaller next to his own recent history: $30 million against Gervonta Davis in 2023, another $30 million against Devin Haney in 2024, and $20 million for the Mario Barrios win that got him the WBC belt. Against that backdrop, a $15 million defense is below his career peak, even in a fight he was favoured to win comfortably.
For Benn, the same number lands differently. His two fights against Chris Eubank Jr. paid roughly $10 million each, and his first Zuffa Boxing card against Regis Prograis matched this fight’s $15 million figure. A $15 million purse against a genuine box-office name like Garcia keeps Benn at his career high, even in a fight he lost. Benn’s own comment before the deal came together was blunt: asked about motivation beyond money, he said there wasn’t much, “if they say, ‘here’s $15 million,’ no problem.”
Why this matters
Boxing has always been a sport where the money and the sport itself don’t fully overlap, purses have never been a clean function of ticket sales alone. What’s changed is the degree: a single external backer now openly covering a nine-figure combined fight purse, in a state that no longer requires anyone to prove the number publicly, is a different level of dependency than boxing has had before. The sport gets bigger paydays for its biggest stars in the short term. What it’s trading for that is a funding base it doesn’t control and a disclosure standard that’s moved backward exactly as the sums involved have gotten larger.
The Wage Bill